In fact, the Defendant had a debt of approximately KRW 1 billion in KRW 200,000,000 in KRW 25 million in every month in the siren business operated by himself/herself, and thus, the Defendant did not have any intent and ability to complete payment even if he/she borrowed the purchase price from the Victim B Co., Ltd.

Nevertheless, on August 12, 2016, the Defendant purchased the amount of oos car at the office D Co., Ltd., a company with the third second class of the building in Sungnam-si and the third class of the company with the third class of the company, and received a request from the injured party for a loan contract. The Defendant would pay the second class of the company B to the company B, i.e., e., 953,480 won each month to the company, i.e., e., 60 months.

‘Falsely speaking, the victim made the victim transfer KRW 42 million to the account in the name of D Co., Ltd. for the purchase price of the vehicle on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, acquired the pecuniary benefits equivalent to 42 million won from the victim.

On July 24, 2016, the Defendant of “2017 Highest 785, the Defendant would pay KRW 40 million to the victim H by November 24, 2016, when he/she lends a rental car office in the maintenance plant and Seoul, as he/she is urgently required to operate the rental car office in the maintenance plant and the Seoul.

“.....”

However, in fact, the Defendant’s end-up maintenance plant is operated by I, and the Defendant did not have any right to the maintenance plant. Moreover, the Defendant had a total amount of KRW 140 million to the J, which is already located in the area of KRW 30 million, KRW 30 million to the above I, KRW 450 million to K, and KRW 1 billion to the bond manager, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged person, he/she would have used it as business fund as agreed to use it for repayment of each of the above obligations, or would have used it as business fund and repaid the above money until November 24, 2016 to the victim.