2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On March 4, 2012, the Plaintiff (BB and male) entered the company with the same Gangnam Close Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Dong Close”) as a contractual position and worked in the assembly process on September 1, 2012, and started conducting the inspection of automobile engine system case products and the removal work, etc., from September 2014 to the telegraph. Since around March 18, 2015, the Plaintiff (around March 18, 2015, he/she was inspected in C Hospital and D Hospital, and as a result, he/she was found to have undergone the inspection by excluding both sides arms and arms.

B. On July 9, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for the first medical care benefits against the Defendant on the ground that “it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relationship between the instant injury and disease and the Plaintiff’s business” on September 22, 2015.

C. On January 29, 2016, the Plaintiff, dissatisfied with the disposition of non-approval of the above medical care, filed a request with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee for reexamination, and the said Review Committee rendered a ruling to revoke the part of the above disposition of non-approval of the above medical care, and to dismiss the claim against the injury or disease of this case on the ground that the injury or disease of this case is found to have a proximate causal relation with the Plaintiff’s work, but the injury or disease of this case is not confirmed or not related to the Plaintiff’s work.

In this case, on September 22, 2015, a disposition of non-approval for medical care was issued on September 22, 2015.

(iii) [Evidences 1, 2, 4, 1 and 7 which have no dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence 1, 2, 4, and Eul evidence.