2. The judgment that the defendant reflects the crime and that the victims of the traffic accident do not want the punishment against the defendant is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the following is disadvantageous.

The crime of this case is committed by the defendant while driving a motor vehicle again after several hours before and after the previous day, and the crime is not committed and is not committed.

In the past, the defendant has been sentenced to suspended sentence due to drinking driving and driving without a license, and has been sentenced to suspended indictment due to drinking driving.

Since the risk of recidivism is deemed to be high in light of the defendant's behavior of drinking driving, it is necessary to punish the defendant strictly.

In addition, in full view of the circumstances of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.