At around 19:00 on August 8, 201, the Defendant thought that the victim E (the age of 36) who had been engaged in te (the age of 36) who had been engaged in teice practice could be satisfied when the Defendant was taking a course of teice from D, who is an teice instructor, and was strongly taking the course of teice training in the teice pocketet. However, the Defendant did not fulfill his duty of due care and did not cause the victim to be injured due to her pro-Japanese being flick in accordance with the left-hand eye of the victim, thereby causing the victim's injury to the victim, such as the eromatic erogical erode, the erogical erogrosis, the ero

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court, the following facts can be acknowledged.

(1) From July 14, 201 to the date and time indicated in the facts charged, the Defendant, who was the primary candidate, received 4 times a week from the above indoor tennis, for about one month. At the time and time indicated in the facts charged, the Defendant was receiving a singinging that the Defendant, who was the Defendant, was taking four times a week from the above indoor tennis. In light of the opportunity and time indicated in the facts charged, the Defendant was receiving a singing that the Defendant, who was the primary candidate, was taking part of the part on the right-hand side of the above tennis (at the time, the singing portion was only three and provided by dividing one cot into two parts, the right-hand side, and divided into two parts, and provided it as a place for the course or practice, taking into account the convenience of the course for its members.)

(2) On the other hand, from July 10, 201, the victim, who had taken lessons in the above indoor tennis course from the above indoor tennis course, took lessons from froccos on the date and time set forth in the facts charged. The defendant transferred the lessons to the left side of the croccos (in light of the defendant's standard, the opposite part of the croccos in the direction of the croccos) that the defendant was taking lessons from croccos as above, and performed the chers practice together with G, which is a member of the above tennis course.