2. The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

The Defendants, who worked for employees in a mutual game place without the names of the winners of Pyeongtaek-si D, provided game products different from those rated by the Rating Board for distribution or use, or arranged for exchange or exchange of tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of the game products. However, on November 13, 2012, the above persons without the name of the Defendants provided 50 players and 20 players with 50 players in the above game place and 70 players in the so-called “sea so that they promote speculation by not being rated.” The Defendants provided them with the above game products by inserting cash in the above game machine to unspecified customers, and provided them with high points according to such methods as 4,50 won per 10% per 1 gift certificates acquired by them, and provided them with the above 30 players’ name and 100 won per 1 gift certificates and arranged them to exchange with the above 310 players’ name and 130 days per 1,000 won per 1,000 customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Each statement of H, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, and Q;

1. Application of the statutes governing seizure records, seizure lists, and cocoinization of goods;

1. Promotion of each of the relevant Articles of law and punishment for the facts constituting an offense;