통행방해금지
1. The plaintiff (Appointed)'s appeal and the preliminary claim added at the trial are all dismissed.
2. Appeal;
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "the plaintiffs added "the first drawing" in Section 2, Section 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance; "the drawings" in Section 2, Section 18 of the judgment; "the second drawing" in Section 5 of the judgment; and "the plaintiffs shall be entitled to the second drawing" in Section 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance; "the plaintiffs shall be entitled to the second drawing" in Section 1, 2, 3, and 1 of the annexed drawing No. 2, in sequence 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the land of this case, and the defendant shall purchase the land of this case with the knowledge that he consented to the use of "the second drawing" as the passage of residents; therefore, the plaintiffs shall not interfere with the second drawing of the preliminary drawing of the judgment of this case as the preliminary passage of the land of this case; and the second drawing of Section 4 of the Civil Procedure Act shall not allow the plaintiffs to use the second section as the preliminary passage of the land of this case."
2. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's main claim and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance on the plaintiff's main claim is just, and the plaintiff's main claim are all dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court of first instance on the plaintiff's main claim.