1. As to Defendant B’s appeal, Defendant B did not submit a written reason for appeal within the submission period of the written reason for appeal, and Defendant B did not state the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the records, the lower court’s judgment that ordered Defendant A to collect KRW 125,964,360 on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and it is not erroneous for the lower court to have imposed an additional collection of KRW 16,049,872 on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation

Meanwhile, the prosecutor appealed to the remainder of collection except for the additional collection related to the crime of opening a gambling space for Defendant A, but did not indicate the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal and did not indicate the grounds for appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.