beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.15 2016가단5107496

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant Samsung Fire Marine Co., Ltd., and 151,430,139 won, and Defendant Samsung Fire Marine Co., Ltd., are the Defendants.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 17, 2015, the Plaintiff is a person who, around 17, 2015, has the right eyeed by Defendant B’s Draber, who had been engaged in golf wing practice in the string of the instant indoor golf driving range (hereinafter “instant indoor golf driving range”) located on the 163rd floor of the 34-ro, Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul (In-house 2015, the 3-party 3-party 2-party 2).

B. Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) is a company operating the above helicopter and indoor golf practice range. Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) is an insurer who entered into a contract for compensation liability insurance for sports facility business entities by providing that “Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”) captures the contractor and the insured, from April 7, 2015 to April 7, 2016, with the insurance period as “10 million won per accident’s compensation limit.”

(hereinafter “instant liability insurance”). C.

The indoor golf driving range of this case is installed in a series of instant indoor golf driving ranges which are individually engaged in golf wing practice, and there is a golf straw in the wall pole with a white string and multiple golf wing products.

The plaintiff completed the use of the indoor golf range in this case, and displayed a white string time on the white string, which was caused by the wall pole, before coming to the exit, and then string the string to the extent of the string, and string off the string to the end of the string, and string off the string to the end of the plaintiff's right eye on the stringer string of the defendant B, who was on the right side of the above white string.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff is aware of the instant accident following the external traumatic eye of the lele, e.g., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e.