When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 2, 2017, around 23:15, the Defendant reported to the D District in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon to the effect that the Defendant reported “to be intending to be able to serve as a taxi driver,” and that the police officer E belonging to the said District would pay the Defendant a fee to the Defendant, and then, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant returned the taxi driver, and the flag, “the flabing, flads, and flabed,” and the flabing of the flab, and the flab, shall be discarded by the death of the flab.

“To the extent that it threatens, to the extent near, and to the extent that E is pushed and pushed ahead of the defendant’s chest;

The defendant was cited by the defendant for the defect E

Hand-phones were collected.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate performance of official duties in relation to global guard service.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended sentence on May 10, 2017 and committed the crime of this case even though he/she was currently under the suspended sentence, etc. on the grounds that he/she committed the crime of this case. However, in light of the fact that the defendant deposited 200,000 won for the police officer for the same kind of crime, the fact that he/she did not have the same criminal record, and that he/she is deeply divided into his/her mistake, the court takes into consideration the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and means of the crime, result, etc., as well as all of the sentencing factors described in the arguments of this case, such as the crime after the crime, it is ordered to select a fine only once. It is so decided as per Disposition.