beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.11.29 2013고단3653

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. B’s act of violating the restriction on vehicle operation on the roads prior to the examination of the vehicle operation on January 18, 2007, which is the employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, around the 7th of the facts charged. 2. The penal provisions applied to the summary order subject to review on January 29, 201 are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality [the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24, October 28, 2010, Supreme Court Decision 2010Hun-Ga38, October 28, 2010, Supreme Court Decision 2008Hun-Ga17, July 30, 2009]. Thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.