However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 20, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of road traffic law in the Changwon District Court's Seoul District Court's branch on October 20, 206, and on March 27, 2009, issued a summary order of KRW 1,50,000 as a fine for a violation of road traffic law in the Changwon District Court's branch office.

Although the Defendant had been punished twice or more due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) as above, on October 3, 2015, at around 15:10, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.195%, without obtaining a driver’s license from around 14 km to the road near the knive distance in the south-gu Gyeong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on the driving of drinking and the circumstantial report on the driver of drinking;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiry letter, investigation report (formers and attachment of judgment) and statutes, such as criminal history;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving)

1. Punishment provided for in Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act for the ordinary concurrent crimes (Punishment provided for in a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act with heavier punishment);

1. Selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the following grounds for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, again committed the crime of this case, and the drinking value is high, there is a need for strict punishment of the defendant.

However, there is a criminal record more than a suspended sentence due to the same crime that the defendant reflects his/her own mistake and does not repeat his/her offense.