A. The land assessment and registration relation 1) the land assessment and registration relation 1) of the real estate list No. 1 and 1) the land assessment division before Echeon-gun H is indicated as the site. 60 square meters is written in the Land Investigation Division as the J having an address in I was under the circumstances of the land assessment division. The said land was subdivided into 14 square meters before K, L, 43 square meters before M on December 31, 1958, and thereafter the said K, K, and L were converted from the entire land category to the answer, as shown in [Attachment 1] List No. 1 and 2 of the Real Estate List No. 1, 1967. The land indicated in paragraph (1) was converted into the name change and the administrative district unit (hereinafter referred to as “instant land No. 1” and the land indicated in paragraph (2) into “instant land No. 2”.

(2) Defendant Republic of Korea completed the registration of initial ownership on the land prior to the said subdivision by the Suwon District Court Leecheon District Court, Leecheon Registry, 1956, received on June 30, 1956.

B. The land condition and registration relation 1) the name of the administrative district appears to have been changed to AF after the Gyeonggi-gun N condition of the land listed in paragraph (3) of the list of real estate. The former 1,078 square meters was entered in the Land Survey Division as the P, who was an address in theO on June 29, 1912, and later was converted into a land category change, administrative district change, and area unit as described in paragraph (3) of the list of real estate 1 (hereinafter the above land stated in paragraph (3) of the same Article).

(2) On the other hand, as to the land of this case No. 3, the Suwon District Court: (a) received on February 13, 1995, No. 3210, the registration of ownership was completed in the name of the Defendant Republic of Korea; (b) filed a lawsuit against the Defendant Republic of Korea to seek the implementation of the procedure for registration of cancellation of the above registration of ownership preservation on the ground that Q, who is the successor of the above P, was the owner who succeeded in succession in succession; (c) received a final and conclusive judgment in favor of the Defendant (U.S. District Court Decision 2002Da4001, Suwon District Court Decision 2003Na8951, May 10, 2004).

3. As to the third land of this case thereafter.