A. In fact, the Defendant did not err by misapprehending the legal principles or by misapprehending the legal principles, nor did he take the rubber strings of gas pipes using the kitchen blades, or by harming the victim’s improvement.

B. The lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to gas emissions and interference with gas supply in the holding of the court below, the court below found the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment below, i.e., (i) F living on the third floor of the Defendant’s house, out of the investigative agency and the court of the court of the court below as follows: (ii) smelling out through the window around 1 p.m. on the day of the instant case, and (iii) was mixed up to 3 meters of the LPG gas through the Defendant’s house, and used at D childcare centers at the Defendant’s house.

In the process of conflict about about 10 minutes after the report is required, the Defendant made a concrete and consistent statement that the sound in gas, along with the sound in which the sound in gas was seen to go out of the window again, and put the kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's kn's k's kn'.

2) Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in comparison with the records, the lower court’s judgment is justifiable.