beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.10.10 2018구단14397

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 24, 2017, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Senegal (hereinafter “Senegal”) as a foreigner of the nationality, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on June 22, 2017, when entering the Republic of Korea as a short-term visit sojourn.

B. On August 4, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision on the refusal of refugee status on the ground that the Defendant cannot recognize “ sufficiently based fears that would be prejudicial to persecution” as the requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on September 11, 2017, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the objection on March 21, 2018.

On May 28, 2018, the Plaintiff received the notice of dismissal of the said objection, and filed the instant lawsuit on July 16, 2018.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1 through 4, Eul's 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff engaged in the production and supply of windows, etc. at the Senegal. However, even when the dubio B (B; hereinafter “B”) employed by the Plaintiff received 2,600,000 square meters of the production cost of windows from customers around February 2017, he/she did not use it for the aforementioned designated purpose, but used it for the personal purpose.

Accordingly, on February 22, 2017, the Plaintiff reported B to the police with a view to pressure B to prevent any damage to the customer, and received the return of 50,000 square wave from B.

However, when the Plaintiff demanded the return of the remainder of 2.1 million square wave to B, the Plaintiff sought from B and their siblings (the Plaintiff’s double-presidential agents, as shown in B; hereinafter in combination with B, “B, etc.”) to use the Plaintiff as the camping net, and to murder the Plaintiff by employing the murderer.

If the Plaintiff returned to the Republic of Korea, B, etc.