However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

On January 22, 2015, while Defendant A took a meeting at the restaurant for operation of DD located in Silung-si on January 22, 2015, Defendant A was in dispute with Defendant E, etc. with the day he was spared, Defendant A was under the control of the police station of Silung-si, who was dispatched after receiving 112 report, and was under the control of Defendant G et al.

Defendant

B The above patroler assaulted the Defendant A, who was guilty of indecent act by indecent act by force, with flabing the flab G’s flab to capture the Defendant A into committing an act of indecent act by force.

또한, 피고인 A은 시흥시 H 소재 F파출소로 연행된 후 맞은 편에 앉아 있는 E에게 “개새끼들아 내가 언제 추행했냐, 썅년아 말 똑바로 해”라고 욕설하고 경장 I이 다시 제지를 하자 “씨팔놈아 젊은 새끼가 뭘 안다고 지랄이야, 젊은 새끼들이 경찰관을 하네, J 정부 똘만이 새끼들, 민중의 지팡이가 이래도 돼 ”라고 소리치며 위 파출소에서 약 20여분에 걸쳐 욕설을 하면서 안내데스크를 발로 차는 등 경찰들을 상대로 협박하고, 피고인 C는 지원업무를 나온 시흥경찰서 형사과 소속 K팀 형사인 경장 L이 피고인들을 경찰서로 연행하기 위해 시흥경찰서 소속 52호 순찰차에 태우려고 하자 “너 몇 살이냐, 개새끼들아”라며 소리치며 경장 L의 다리를 발로 수회 걷어차고, 두 손으로 가슴 부위를 수회 때렸다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of E, M, G, or L;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the sponsing of the suspect A with a police box sent by the suspect A;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Defendants of a suspended sentence: The unfavorable circumstances for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are the same.