Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On November 28, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. in the Incheon District Court Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 11, 2019.

No automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on a road.

From October 2012 to May 19, 2013, the Defendant possessed B-learning passenger cars without purchasing mandatory insurance from around May 19, 2013. On September 25, 2014, the Defendant operated the said passenger car at the Handong-dong, Busan, as Busan, on January 15, 2015, as Busan, on March 4, 2015, as Busan, on March 4, 2015, and on April 15, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Medical insurance contract, inquiry, and inquiry of the quantity of non-insurance running cars;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: Application of statutes to each copy of the judgment [the Vice-President of the Incheon District Court 2018, 2043, 2018, 2945, Incheon District Court 2018No4226, 2019Do5706];

1. Article 46(2)2 of the Act on Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation and the main sentence of Article 8 of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (Amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015); Article 46(2)2 of the Motor Vehicle Accident Compensation Guarantee Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the same Act (amended by Act No. 12987, Sep. 25, 2014); each of the crimes is committed on January 15, 2015; the crime committed on March 4, 2015; the crime committed on April 15, 2015; and each of fines is selected)

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (limited to concurrent crimes with punishment and punishment heavier than punishment)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Each of the crimes of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant did not purchase mandatory insurance and operated his/her vehicle four times, and that the defendant has been punished several times for traffic crimes, and that the defendant has other records of age, character and conduct of the defendant.