손해배상(자)
1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part of the plaintiffs' failure that constitutes the following order to pay shall be revoked.
1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as stated in paragraph 1 of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal as follows. Thus, this Court’s explanation is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
During the 13th of the judgment of the first instance, "in 223" is added to "in 223", and "on the left side of the direction" in the 15th of the same side is added to "on the left side of the direction".
The 3th judgment of the first instance court is 4 to 8th judgment as follows.
(d)
On the other hand, E was indicted as a crime of violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death) with respect to the instant accident (Seoul District Court 2017 order 2118). On the other hand, on December 20, 2017, the court of first instance convicted E of the facts charged and sentenced E to one year without prison labor.
E appealed against the above judgment of the first instance court (Seoul District Court 2018No. 128), and on August 30, 2018, the appellate court of the instant case found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in consideration of the fact that E reached an agreement with the bereaved family members of the deceased and reached an appellate trial, but sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence for August, 201, and the said appellate judgment became final and conclusive around that time because both the prosecutor and the E did not appeal.
During the 9th judgment of the first instance court, “No. 22 B” is raised as “No. 2 B (including a number; hereinafter the same shall apply)” in the 9th judgment.
2. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the liability for damages are as stated in Paragraph 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases. Thus, this part of the liability for damages is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
During the fourth fourth trial of the judgment of the first instance, “not “,” during the same four parallels, from “the deceased’s “ to “,” during the fourth parallels on the same four parallels, shall read “n’s apartment (N apartment) of the deceased even from the point of 00:46 to the point of 00:46.”
Of the fourth week 2 of the first instance judgment, “L apartment” appears to be “N apartment (LbO’s “O” among the above medicine map appears to be a clerical error in NbO’s “O”)”.
The "01 Si" during the fourth 8th 8th e.g., the judgment of the first instance is "01."