beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.08.26 2015고단629 (1)

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and nine months at the Daejeon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 9, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 2013, the Defendant, at the office located in Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, said that “The Defendant would conclude a contract to allow the victim D to undertake construction works to remove the floor of the said apartment if it is short of construction expenses to resume the construction of the said apartment that was suspended.”

However, in fact, the above apartment was in dispute between the owner of the real estate and the construction company, and the defendant only spent the expenses for the contract for the above apartment construction, and there was no intention or ability for the defendant to contract the removal of the apartment floor to the victim.

As such, the Defendant deceivings the victim as such, and up to three million won around May 3, 2013 under the pretext of borrowing from the victim.

From June 1, 2013 to July 19, 2014, a total of 26,900,000 won was remitted or acquired through the above means, as shown in the attached Table 1, 2, for the purpose of borrowing or guarding the victim, by deceiving the victim through the above methods, including the receipt of remittance of KRW 6 million around June 1, 2013, and by receiving and deceiving it.

2. On November 2013, the Defendant introduced the victim “G” of the F Company that was in charge of the above camping site construction at a restaurant where the trade name in the Daejeon East-gu Complex is unknown, to the victim D at the street near the Daejeon University. The Defendant introduced the victim “G” of the F Company that was in charge of the above camping site construction at a restaurant where the trade name in the Daejeon East-gu Complex Terminal is unknown.

However, fact is that E was a person irrelevant to the above Trido Y and the defendant was willing to contract the above work to the victim.