All appeals filed by A, B, C, and Prosecutor are dismissed.

A. Defendant A, B, and C’s sentence (one year and six months of imprisonment, one year and eight months of imprisonment, and ten months of imprisonment) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence (the above sentence and the imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant D) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The court may take into account the following circumstances in favor of the Defendants: (a) the Defendants recognized their mistakes; (b) there was an agreement with the victims; and (c) the amount of damage was not significantly significant; and (d) the Defendants A, C, and D were initial offenders.

On the other hand, the crime of this case, which has recently been harmful to society, needs to be punished for severe punishment because it is not good for the crime to be committed as a kind of so-called “Sing” crime, and taking into account the position and frequency of the Defendants’ act in the so-called Bossing criminal organization, as well as the motive and background leading up to the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the age, sexual behavior, environment, etc., it cannot be deemed that the court below’s punishment against the Defendants is too heavy or unreasonable. Thus, the Defendants and the prosecutor’s aforementioned assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal by the Defendants and the public prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the Defendants and the public prosecutor is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.