폭행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives is the defendant, and the victim C (the third party) is the director of the committee for emergency countermeasures against the above apartment.
On July 9, 2019, at around 23:0, the Defendant assaulted the victim, on the ground that the victim did not know himself/herself/herself/herself/herself/herself at the council of occupants' representatives, on the top of the E cafeteria located D, the Defendant: (a) committed assaulting the victim on the part of the victim; (b) he/she took the part of the part of the victim; (c) towed to the upper part of the body of the victim by drinking; and (d) when he/she took the part of the body of the victim by drinking.
2. According to Article 260(1) and (3) of the Criminal Act, a crime of assault cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent.
However, according to the records, it can be recognized that a written agreement stating the victim's intent to "not want to punish the defendant" has been submitted to this court after the prosecution of this case was instituted.
3. According to the conclusion, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.