A. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor (under four months) by the court below is too unhued and unfair.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is deemed to have suffered significant injury on the victim who dried a crosswalk by negligence while neglecting the duty to stop in front of the vehicle while driving the vehicle in front of the vehicle, and the nature of the crime and the circumstances of the crime are not provided against the victim; the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim; on the other hand, the defendant recognized the crime of this case as a primary offender who does not have a previous criminal record and seriously reflects his mistake; the defendant deposited KRW 5,00,000 for the victim at the trial; and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, etc., it is not recognized that the defendant's punishment against the defendant is too poor or unreasonable. Thus, both the prosecutor and the defendant's assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.