However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 1, 2014, at the main point of "D" located in Ansan-si C, around 04:00, the Defendant reported that the Defendant did not pay the drinking value of KRW 44,000, and used the Defendant’s 112 to stop home, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) whether the Defendant paid the drinking value and returned home; (b) whether the Defendant paid the drinking value; (c) whether the Defendant paid the drinking value; and (d) whether the fluor of the fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a fluor of a flus

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment (such as the fact that a person repeats a crime despite the same kind of force, and the fact that a damaged police officer wishes to strong punishment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution)