When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant served as a security guard of the Busan So-gu C Apartment.

On July 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 14:30 on July 15, 2014, at the guard room of the above apartment complex, the victim D, the same security guard, was previously dismissed, and returned to the original state; (b) the Defendant and other security guards, as well as the victim, were the residents of E, who entered the same place, to receive a choice, while the wages of other security guards, such as the Defendant, have decreased; and (c) “I would like to examine up to what is the dys of the remaining dys of this case, and what is the dys of dementia.”

As above, the Defendant openly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant concerning the examination of partially the prosecution;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of the main sentence of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or above.