If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On May 7, 2017, at the police box C of the literature police station located in D around 1:30 on May 7, 2017. On the same day, the Defendant: (a) sought complaints against the process of arresting a flagrant offender in the face of the State revocation D’s friendly arrest of the new wall D on the same day; and (b) sought to the police officer on duty under the influence of alcohol; (c) whether the case “D is too too difficult;

The words, such as how he or she gets off, saying, he or she would come well, and expressed a complaint for about one hour, and the police officers, including sloping E, expressed that he or she would be able to have the defendant come home in and return home out of the police box, and that he or she expressed that he or she would not be able to give him or her any danger and injury, such as "I would like to be able to come home, I would like to see that he or she will not be able to give him or her abrupt, and that he or she will go home, and that he or she will go back to E, and that he or she will go again.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of civil petitions and patrol of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of each investigation report (Nos. 5 and 8 of the evidence list), and statutes for internal investigation reports (No. 6 of the evidence list);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;