보험사기방지특별법위반
[Defendant A, B, and F] Defendant A’s imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for 6 months, and Defendant F’s imprisonment for 4 months, respectively.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal record] Defendant I was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months from the Suwon District Court on May 7, 2020 and one year from the suspended execution of the Military Service Act, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 15, 2020.
【Criminal Facts】
The Defendants shared their roles as solicitors, drivers of sea-going vehicles, passengers of sea-going vehicles, drivers of damaged vehicles, and passengers of damaged vehicles, etc., and conspired to receive insurance money from the insurance company after intentionally paying the traffic accident.
Defendant
A around August 10, 2019, around August 10, 2019, Defendant B recruited Defendant B by making a proposal to “a defect like an insurance bomb with a bomb,” and by making a proposal to Defendant F to “a person who will be engaged in providing insurance bomb, as if he/she wanted to do so,” and Defendant F recruited Defendant B as the role of the driver of the damaged vehicle around August 18, 2019, and Defendant E and the passenger of the damaged vehicle. Defendant B interfered with Defendant B’s role as the bomer of the damaged vehicle, and Defendant B interfered with the role of the passenger on the same day as the bomb passenger on the same day, and Defendant C was working together with Defendant C’s vehicle.
On August 18, 2019, the Defendants collected in front of the Jung-si located in Pyeongtaek-si, and specifically gathered each of their roles, place of accident, and method of accident, and according to the aforementioned public offering, in the street near the “LL” of Pyeongtaek-si on the same day at around 22:23 of the same day, Defendant E stops and waits with Defendant F, G, Defendant H, and Defendant I while leaving the vehicle in front of Mu-si, and Defendant B intentionally shocked the front side of the said low-priced vehicle with Defendant C, Defendant D’s vehicle in HG with Defendant 2 and Defendant D attached to the N.
Defendant B continued to post a telephone to the victim call center at around 23:26 on the same day, and "in the city, the vehicle is the low-priced vehicle that stops in a passenger vehicle."