If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

No act of possessing goods identical with or similar to the designated goods on which another person's registered trademark or any other trademark similar thereto is indicated, for the purpose of transfer or delivery.

피고인은 2015. 7. 9. 15:30경 서울 중구 C에 있는 ‘D건물’ 3층 다-38호 피고인 운영의 ‘E’ 매장에서, 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 특허청 등록상표 내역에 기재된 ‘샤넬’ 등의 위조상표가 부착된 ‘샤넬’ 스카프 10점 등 위조상품 총 35점(정품 추정 시가 합계 28,330,000원)을 판매 목적으로 소지하여 해당 상표권자의 상표권을 침해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation record of seizure;

1. Price estimate of authentic goods, appraisal opinion, and price list of authentic goods, and the original trademark register;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the site and photographs of seized articles;

1. Article 93 of the Trademark Act regarding facts constituting an offense and Article 93 of the relevant Act regarding the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 97-2 (1) of the Trademark Act that is confiscated;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;