However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 3, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Busan District Court on August 3, 2006, and on December 5, 2012, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 3 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

On April 2, 2019, the Defendant, who had been punished for drinking driving more than twice as above, driven C Twit-in car at a level of about 50 meters from the front day of the packing end in Busan Dong-dong to the front day of the B building in Busan Dong-dong, to a level of about 0.155% alcohol level, while under the influence of alcohol, around 06:08.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver, and inquiry into the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous records: The application of criminal records, inquiry and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 148-2(1)1 and 44(1) of the former Road Traffic Act (Amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018); the choice of imprisonment for a crime

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act are as follows: (a) considering the fact that the defendant has been punished twice as a drinking alcohol exclusively; (b) the blood alcohol concentration was significantly high; and (c) the previous and two times, the fact that the defendant has been punished by a fine; and (d) taking into account the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime; and (e) taking into account all the circumstances that form conditions for sentencing