Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

1. On December 16, 2015, the Defendant sent a text message that threatens the husband of the victim as if he would have a son’s sexual intercourse with the victim’s husband, by using his mobile phone, that the victim’s cell phone did not pay the victim’s money borrowed. However, on December 16, 2015, the Defendant sent a text message that threatens the victim’s husband to have a son’s sexual intercourse.

In other words, the victim was threatened.

2. The Defendant, on March 2, 2016, around 14:39, in the same manner as indicated in paragraph 1, in the same manner as indicated in paragraph 1, on the part of the Victim’s mobile phone, “the Defendant exceeded the governance of the Victim’s mobile phone of the same year.”

N. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L

I see, “I see” and send text messages threatening the husband of the victim as if the victim’s male relationship would be breadthed.

In other words, the victim was threatened.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the closure of text messages;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;