공무집행방해
Defendant shall be punished by a fine for negligence in KRW 6,000,000 (F1 million).
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.
Punishment of the crime
On June 17, 2018, the Defendant was urged to return home after receiving a report related to the 1112 military service in front of the D cafeteria located in the Guri-si, 08:38, from the assistant F for a police box affiliated with the Guri-si, Police Station Epis dispatched.
The Defendant: (a) Hashekh, Hashek, and Hashekh; (b) Hashekhn Hashekhn Hashekn only Hashekn Hashekn Hashen only Hashekn Hashen Hashen Hashen Hashen Hashen Hashen Hashen Hashen only Hashen Hashen Hashen Hashen Hashen Hashen?)
The term "" is called, and the part of the slope F was tightly pushed down twice with the hand floor, and assault was committed.
As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of crimes reported.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. A written statement of G and F;
1. A copy of the work log;
1. 112 Reporting case handling table;
1. Application of the CDA-1 statute
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. In light of various circumstances, such as the circumstance leading up to the crime acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the means and method of the crime, and the Defendant’s behavior before and after the crime, determination of the Defendant’s mental and physical disorder under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant had no or weak ability to discern things at the time of the crime.
The reason for sentencing shows the attitude of the defendant to see his mistake as a substitute, and seek a letter to the damaged police officer.
The defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case by contingency.
Other punishment shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the various circumstances shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, method and attitude of the crime, and circumstances before and after the crime.