beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.05.11 2017고단377

업무방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 4, 2016, the Defendant interfering with the Defendant’s business: (a) from the D regularly outdoor department located in Asan City around 08:25 on October 4, 2016; and (b) on the ground that the elevator located in the street of the above hospital building in the above hospital was not in operation and inconvenience; (c) on the ground that the above D regularly outdoor department and staff E and the victim F were not in operation; (d) whether the said D regularly outdoor department and the elevator

In this regard, the victims were able to take a bath with a large sound, and interfered with the patient's receipt work by force.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place, and at the time, at the hospital, reported by 112 the fact that there was a person who frighting the plaque at the hospital, and sent out to the victim H, the victim I, the police officer belonging to the G District at the ASEAN Police Station G District, and the victim I, “this dog, flads, flads, flads, and flads, one of them;

Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz.

whether they have been under arrest;

We see my mind, we have to grow up with the dynas, the dynas why the weather dynas, the flas, and the police laves, and the victims were sexually insulting.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, I, and H;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not agreed with the victims of the reason for the sentencing of the provisional payment order, the recognition of and reflects on the crime, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as the sentence as above.