beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.11.23 2016고단3883

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and C, nameless winners et al., known that they would make a loan to the low-income bracket through commercial banks, and prepared a false certificate of employment and a benefit ledger to draw up a document that plays a role of enhancing the credit rating of false lessees, bank service and loan arrangement measures in charge of loan-related affairs, false lessors and lessee who have no intention or ability to repay even if they own a house but do not receive a loan from a third party, and want to use the loan by deceiving the staff in charge of the Bank by taking charge of the loan.

C. On March 2014, the name-free person prepared a false document necessary to obtain a housing lease loan, such as a certificate of employment, a four-party social insurance coverage certificate, and a certificate of income tax withholding, as the defendant, who is an applicant for a loan at an unsound place, and transferred it to the defendant, who is a false lessee.

E, on October 6, 2014, after falsely recruited the G entrusted by the Housing Owner F as a lessor, the E prepared a false lease contract and transferred it to the Defendant, as if the F and the Defendant entered into a lease contract with the 100 million won (contract amounting to KRW 10 million) of the lease deposit (contract amounting to KRW 100 million) in the I Real Estate Office located in Hacheon-gu, Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is operated by E, as of October 6, 2014.

around October 2014, the Defendant applied for a loan of KRW 70,000,00 to the staff in charge of the loan at the Cheongdoro 51, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu Office for Bank of Korea for a loan of KRW 70,000,000 to the staff in charge of the loan. In fact, although the Defendant did not intend to lease a house in accordance with the aforementioned lease contract and did not have worked in D, the Defendant was working in D, and acted as if he had worked in D as a deposit for the lease.