However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a small-scale taxi in C.

At around 01:37 August 8, 2016, the Defendant, while driving in the Changdong Cemetery of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, on the Changdong Station from the Cheongsan Station, the Defendant, in violation of the signal, went against the victim D (the age of 28) who was driving from the right side of the Defendant to the left side in accordance with the normal new name of the victim D (the age of 28) who was driving on the right side of the road by failing to comply with the signal.

After all, the defendant's occupational negligence caused injury to the victim D, such as a multi-faceted heat, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim D, and the victim F, who was on the back of the above Oral Ocean, to approximately eight weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to documentary evidence photographs and medical certificates;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (such as the fact that vehicles of the accused are subscribed to the taxi mutual aid association, the fact that the vehicle of the accused is smoothly agreed with the victim F, and the fact that they seem to be against the law) or more;