2.Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

[2017 Highest 111) The Defendant, at around 22:50 on November 7, 2016, performed drinking together with the victim E (30 years) and F, which is the crew of the Defendant, at two times the “D Sing shop in Seosan City,” and considered that the victim, while doing a dispute with F, she said that he/she would make a speech to F, he/she would do so without any brucation. In light of the above, the Defendant, who was a dangerous object, was flicker to the victim, was at the center of the victim’s head, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as 21 days of medical treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

[2017 Highest 319] On March 29, 2017, the Defendant driven a G salary class III truck under the influence of alcohol level of approximately 0.082% during blood alcohol level from approximately 20 K K to the entrance of the west Coast Highway, which is located in the Do near the west-si, Seosan-si, Seosan-si, Seosan-si to the west-si, Seosan-do.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 111]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury (2017 highest group 319);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the circumstances of drivers at home;

1. Relevant legal provisions and special injuries to the facts of crime: Driving under Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act: Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act (within the maximum of a maximum of punishment);

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (no person for whom agreement with a victim of special injury or a person for whom a fine has been imposed has been exceeded) of the mitigated amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (resumed grounds for reduction of amount);