The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below was just in finding Defendant Q and S guilty of all the charges of this case on the grounds as stated in its holding. Contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by violating the logical and empirical rules and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the requirements for

Defendant

The other grounds for appeal by Q or S do not constitute legitimate grounds for appeal under Article 383 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

2. Next, Defendant R’s appeal is examined.

Defendant

R did not submit a statement of grounds for appeal within the statutory period, and the petition of appeal does not state the grounds for appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.