2. The judgment was based on the circumstances where part of the theft of this case was returned to the victims, but this is merely a return of the goods, etc. that the defendant was arrested. The defendant committed so-called "day-to-day" crime that the defendant stolens Matoba and drives without a license, and has run away from the bank, and the nature of the crime is poor. The defendant committed the crime of this case again despite the fact that the defendant had been already punished for the crime of the same kind of law, the defendant did not fully recover from the victims, and the victims did not want the victim's punishment, and the victim's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the court below is judged to be appropriate, and it does not seem to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.