On May 24, 2018, the Defendant driven a bicycle on May 24, 2018, and 07:12, led the Defendant to make a right-way at the D intermediate point in C located in C at the time of a show-out, from C’s west bank to E’s gate.

Since there are ways for people to commute to and from the company as bicycles, there was a duty of care for those engaging in bicycle driving service to live well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and the right and the right and duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to overtake the victim F(49 years old)'s bicycle running on the right side while bypassing the bypass. The victim's bicycle front wheels part of the victim's bicycle driving is the front wheels part of the bicycle driving by the defendant, and went beyond the road floor.

The Defendant suffered from the Plaintiff’s occupational negligence, which caused approximately seven weeks of medical treatment to the left-hand side of the Plaintiff, such as the Plaintiff’s left-hand side.

2. The determination of this case is an offense falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and shall not be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act

On June 10, 2019, after the prosecution, the victim expressed his intention that he does not want the punishment of the defendant in this court.

The public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.