beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.04.14 2016고단3803

업무상횡령등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

The defendant pays 37,273,50 won to the applicant E for the compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 3803]

1. The Defendant had been working at the H’s mobile phone agency located in Daegu-gu G from around June 2012 to June 2016 at the event, such as electronic records, and the electronic records of the said writers, etc., who had been working in the place of occupation from the H’s mobile phone agency located in Daegu-gu G, and had already been aware of the personal information of customers who opened the mobile phone at the said mobile phone agency and used the personal information of customers who opened the mobile phone at his/her own discretion, and had the cell phone stolen the name of the customers

On April 6, 2015, the Defendant was a customer of the aforementioned mobile phone agency at the immediately preceding mobile phone agency.

In order to conduct administrative affairs by accessing the I's identification card to the smart application system of KT for the purpose of making use of storing and keeping the I's identification card, the above I's name, life, etc. were entered, and the applicant/subscriber voluntarily signed "I" in the subscriber column and made a new application (J number) in the electronic records. The above date, time, place, pretended as the electronic records where the new application for the aforementioned forged mobile phone was duly formed, sent it to KT and used at the same time, and from that time until March 7, 2016, each of the seven electronic records, including the following: (i) a new application form, application form, subscription, service change application form, which is the electronic records of seven electronic records; and (ii) a new application form, application form, and service change application form, which are the electronic records, which are the seven electronic records of the total sum by melting four customers' names from March 7, 2016.

2. The fraud defendant, as described in paragraph 1, committed as if I applied for new mobile phone at the time, place, as described in paragraph 1, and transmitted a new application for the victim (state)'s personal records to employees in the name of KT as above, which is an electronic record of the company's electronic records, and had the above non-standing person open one cell phone at the above JJ once and one cell phone from the victim KT to the victim KT, which is equivalent to the market price of 1,056,000 won in the above I's name.