1. The Defendant forged a private document with a single team leader, a cause for which personal information is illegible, to collect cash from the victim of Bosing, with a view to suggesting that he was a bank employee when collecting cash from the victim of Bosing, the Defendant forged a completely paid-in certificate in the name of the bank by an unlawful means. The Defendant received a file from the above victim of his name in a false manner and printed it out at the PC bank near the place where cash was collected, and conspired to submit it to the victim of Bosing at the place where cash was collected.

On May 9, 2020, the Defendant printed on May 9, 2020, a copy of a certificate of full payment bearing the official seal of G bank, at the bottom of the content that “The issuer BI proves that the amount of KRW 7.5 million was repaid as of May 8, 2020, to G Bank Co., Ltd., Ltd., the obligor E on May 8, 2020,” using the files of a certificate of full payment received through telegram from the above-known name beneficiary on the same day at the I PC near the PC located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.”

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a certificate of full payment in the name of G Bank Co., Ltd., a private document related to rights and duties for the purpose of exercising his name in collusion.

2. On May 9, 2020, the Defendant in collusion with name in collusion, delivered to E a certificate of full payment that was forged in front of the I’s sentiments located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as if it were a document duly formed, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Report on internal investigation of the E-Written statement (related to attachment of telephone and Kakaoto records with suspects, relation to the certificate of full payment, and relation to the verification of criminal scene);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a copy of passbook;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act for the crime (the Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the use of a falsified investigative document), Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively.