폭행치상
The defendant is innocent.
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is about 02:00 on December 18, 2013, the Defendant drinking alcohol with E, F, and Victim G at the D main points located in Busan coastal Organization C around December 18, 2013, and the victim drinking alcohol with E, F, and Victim G, and the victim’s dispute is about E and money.
The breath of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of the bat of
2. The Defendant asserts that, at the time of the instant case, the victim only told the victim to assault E, and did not cause any harm by assaulting the victim.
First, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the victim suffered the face from the wall.
In addition, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the defendant assaulted the victim's breath by cutting down the breath.
(A) The victim’s statement in the court and in the investigative agency that “the victim testified that he did not memory the defendant’s fat, and witness E and F did not testify that the defendant fatddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
According to the results of the examination of evidence, it seems that there was a little physical fighting, such as threatening the victim to assault or assault E, and removing the victim.
However, it is unclear whether the body fighting was made to a certain extent in detail at the time, the degree of self-defense or the level of a legitimate act, and the victim's fighting occurred in the process of the defendant's speech, whether it occurred in the process of vision with E, or whether it occurred in the process of vision with E, or regardless of other person's assault due to an unforeseen cause.