2. The fact that the judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected it, and that it agreed with the victim of the crime of interference with business at the court below is favorable.

However, the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties has not been committed against a police officer who has legitimate execution of official duties, and there are several criminal records of obstruction of the performance of official duties to the defendant.

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered in the trial of the political party, and in full view of various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.