beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.05.15 2013고합289

특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of four and a half years;

2. One (No. 1) 45g (amam) and net gold, seized net gold.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendant, from around 2006 to Seoul Dongdaemun-gu, operated the occupation house as “H” in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and operated the occupation house as “J” from March 2012 to March 1, 2012.

On January 201, the Defendant came to know that the Victim F (F) (F) who was aware of the fact that he had had sexual intercourse through the introduction of a person who is bound to engage in sexual intercourse on the second half of 2011, had the property of several hundred billion won, but his mother and her mother, without her husband's own consciousness, has come to milling with extreme loss after her mother died in around 2008.

After approaching the victim, the Defendant saw that the marry, such as the death of the victim, was iced to himself, and had the money and valuables collected under the pretext of the price of the contract, etc.

1. Around February 13, 2011, the Defendant: (a) committed an act as if the victim’s dead money was iced on the part of the Defendant at H “H”; (b) made the victim false statement that “I will have to have the right to rescission for our women; and (c) made the victim mistake that I would know that I would know that I would know that I would have to know that I would have to go to the victim, and that I would like to say, “I would like to have the right to rescission. I would like to know that I would know that I would have to go to 20. I would like to know about how much the death of I would have to go to the 20th.”

However, there was no fact that there was a victim's fluor marriage, which led the defendant to talk about this issue, and there was no reason or need to give the victim the right to receive the payment on the ground of the termination of the business.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 7,00,000 from the victim to the SC Japan bank account (K) under the name of the Defendant on February 15, 201, and received KRW 7,00,000 under the name of the beneficiary of the transfer. From that point to February 7, 2013, the Defendant extended 55 times all as shown in attached Table 1.