2. All the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of the instant case and the crime of the instant case are deemed to be committed by an unspecified number of persons, who are committed in a planned and organized manner, and the Defendants’ act of cash withdrawal and delivery is indispensable to achieve the purpose of the crime through Bophishing, and thus the degree of participation in the crime cannot be deemed to be less severe, and the victims’ injury has not been recovered. In full view of the above, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Therefore, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the Defendants’ appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.