1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment as to Defendant A and B’s grounds of appeal, the lower court is just and acceptable to have determined that all of the charges of this case against the Defendants were guilty, and the lower court did not exhaust all necessary deliberations.

There is no error of law by misunderstanding legal principles on the legality of a complaint in a violation of the Copyright Act.

2. Examining the grounds of appeal by Defendant C in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court is acceptable to have found Defendant C guilty of the facts charged of this case for the reasons indicated in its holding.

There are no such errors as exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or as exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of the Copyright Act, the legality of an accusation against a crime of violation of Article 2 subparag. 22 of the same Act, the meaning of “duplicating” under Article 101-3(1)4 of the same Act and the grounds for restrictions on respective property rights in the assertion, the application of the joint penal provisions under Article 141 of

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.