However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 14, 2015, the Defendant damaged the property by searching for the victim D (Woo, 45 years old) house located in Daejeon Dong-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-gu, and making it clear of the victim D’s door “ soon, opening door, opening door, ..........” The victim’s market value, which is the victim’s ownership, sees the front door of the above front door.

2. On May 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) found a place specified in paragraph 1 at around 09:20 on May 14, 2015; and (b) destroyed the front door glass of the said victim, which is a dangerous object that he/she had left, by lowering the front door glass, and thereby damaging the front door glass of the said victim’s possession.

3. The Defendant infringed upon a residence, after shaking the front door damaged at the time, time, and place indicated in paragraph 2, entered the said victim’s house. 4. The Defendant: (a) harming the Defendant, at the time and place indicated in paragraph 2; (b) seeing sound with a glass window, at the said place; and (c) seeing the victim’s breath, “Singhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on investigation;

1. On-site and photographs of damaged articles;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A damaged article (exploos and photographs);

1. Application of the statutes governing estimates for repair;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 369(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act; Article 366 of the Criminal Act; Article 366 of the Criminal Act; Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act; Articles 319(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment with labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: Determination of a sentence to the effect that a confession and reflect is made more favorable to 11 times the records of violent crime, that is agreed with the victim, and that the degree of injury to the victim and the degree of damage are minor: the above circumstances are different.