However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:50 on August 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) requested that the victim F (20 years of age) be sleeped, slicked, slicked, slicked, slicked, and slicked; (b) the victim refused to do so; (c) the victim’s left hand slicked, slicked the victim’s slick, and slicked, which are dangerous things in front of the building (44cm in length, 12 cm in length), and assaulted the victim’s slick, such as the victim’s slick.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes related to photographs seized at the site;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, it is necessary to impose severe punishment because the nature of the crime is not light.

However, the punishment was determined in consideration of the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the crime, the first offender, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the victim.