However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal history] On December 21, 2006, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating road traffic laws (drinking driving) at the Changwon District Court Seowon Branch on December 21, 2006, and received a summary order of KRW 4.5 million for the same crime from the same support on May 16, 2016.

[2] Although Defendant 1 violated the provision prohibiting driving of alcohol on at least two occasions as indicated in the record of the above crime, Defendant 1 driven B-type automobiles under the influence of alcohol content of at least 0.088% while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver’s license from 800 meters in a section of approximately 800 meters away from the Madro parking lot to the front side of the Madro-ray, where he was located in the direction of Sinsan-gun, Sinsan-gun’s Gyeyang-gun’s Gyeyang-gun’s mountain direction, as long as around March 10, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement report and investigation report on the situation of the driver at the main place of business (report on the situation of the driver at the main place of business);

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of two copies of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and a copy of a summary order;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 (Unlicensed Driving) of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving under influence of alcohol) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., shall be determined by taking into account the fact that the order to attend a lecture and the order to provide community service order had a history of being punished several times for the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act,