However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On December 24, 2015, around 01:10 on December 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around Busan District Public Security Center B located in Busan District; (b) D police officers working at the said Public Security Center, who were suffering from disturbance, may be punished as the disturbance for cancellation of the state of the government office.

Upon notification, D expressed that “the Chewing Chewing of flag” was “the Chewing flag, anywhere,” and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the crime prevention affairs by biffing D’s inside on the floor of hand and obstructing D’s legitimate performance of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (with respect to force of violent crime, punishment for one time as a result of the suspended execution for about twenty-eight years shall be flexible and contradictory, the degree of damage, etc. shall be considered);