토지사용료
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance that cited the reasoning of the judgment is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the following contents among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article
Part 5, Chapters 11 through 6, are as follows.
The following circumstances revealed in accordance with the above facts, i.e., (1) D divided forest land into 14 lots on October 12, 1984 (the land of this case, which was actually used for the traffic of the general public while selling 12 lots to third parties Eul), was not sold; (2) owners of four lots of land, such as HH land, I land, J land, and K land, whose ownership was acquired for about 30 years from around 1984 to 1986, were used as a passage to the public road; and (3) owners of the above 4 lots of land were considerably long-term land used as a passage to the public road for the purpose of using the land of this case and its exclusive use or profit-making; and (4) owners of the above 2 lots of land, among the above 4 lots of land, were actually using the land of this case for the purpose of using and profit-making the land of this case for the purpose of using and profit-making the land of this case for the purpose of using it to the public through the road of this case.