However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around April 3, 2013, the Defendant: (a) concealed the fact that the Defendant is running in a studio in Changwon-si, Masan-si, C403; and (b) gathered that the Defendant would be employed as a seafarer by E-owner F; (c) displayed the Defendant’s identification card in possession; (d) the Defendant voluntarily stated the name, resident registration number, address, and telephone number in the column of the job seeker’s column and the borrower’s column of the receipt sheet; and (d) signed the employment contract.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, forged each of the labor contract and receipt in the name of D, a private document related to rights and duties for the purpose of exercising them.

2. Around April 3, 2013, the Defendant and B conspired to use the above investigation document as if the Defendant were a document duly formed by signing one of the forged employment contract and receipt, respectively, to F, who was aware of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A suspect interrogation protocol concerning B by the prosecution;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Written reply of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on employment contracts and receipts prepared in the name of D;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 231, 234, and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Concurrent concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;