A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

1. Defendant A

A. On March 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 18:30, the Defendant damaged the property that he/she owned by the victim E, while drinking B and alcohol in F cafeteria operated by the victim E; and (b) he/she was in a dispute with each other; (c) he/she destroyed the main branch and misunderstanding of the main branch and misunderstanding on the wall of the above cafeteria, and destroyed the property owned by the victim.

B. At around 18:45 on March 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) expressed a bath to police officers belonging to the Yadong Police Station that received a report and sent the report; (b) assaulted the Defendant, i.e., cutting the chest into a brush and pushed the brush with the brush, putting the chest into a brush.

The Defendant continued to be arrested as a flagrant offender and was waiting in the police box, and h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h, and h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

In this way, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties.

2. When Defendant B was arrested as a flagrant offender around March 30, 2014, around 19:15, the Defendant sent a door to the police box, and threatened Defendant B with the following: (a) “I see why we will see our Dograe, when the Korean police is a person,” and “I will not see him even if she will return to her.”

In this way, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of E and H;

1. Each photograph;

1. The defense counsel’s assertion on the prosecutor’s office and police investigation report (Evidence Nos. 9, 16) asserts that the Defendants had mental and physical disorder under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime. However, in light of the background leading up to the instant crime, the method and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the Defendants did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the underbreath alcohol at the time of the instant crime

(2).